Wednesday, September 06, 2006

Assignment 3: Proposal Revision & Presentation

The next assignment involves revising and polishing your proposal. It will be due Tues 12 Sep. On this date you should also have a short, 7 minute presentation describing the project. This will be done in front of the class, and each presentation will be critiqued. There are some common issues with all of the proposals, be sure to address these in your revision:

  • Always have someone else read your proposal! Ask someone to give you feedback and explain your project to you. This will help you identify holes or unclear explanations.
  • Avoid informal language, like "you" and "I". These can be directly substituted with "one" and "we". Imagine that the document speaks for you and your "company", rather than it being written by you.
  • Background, background, background. Be sure to do your due diligence in finding competing work. It will be rare that you have truly novel idea, who else thought of it?
  • Make strong points. Avoid weak or self deprecating comments. This document should convince me that you are the right person/team for the job.
  • Avoid too much internal detail in system description. Your description should be detailed, but only with respect to system boundaries. Delving into specifics about its implementation will confuse the reader, and in many cases make the system seem fuzzier rather than more concrete. Focus on aspects of the description from an "outside" point of view.

Also, make sure that you have reasonable section headings, your cover sheet is only one page and contains your contact info, if you have an itemized budget be sure that it has a total at the bottom. You should go back through the assignment 1 description, and make sure you have addressed each of the topics. Your grade on this project will depend on the amount of improvement when compared to the draft you just submitted.

5 comments:

// laura said...

Avoid informal language, like "you" and "I".

It seems like it would be awkward to try to describe past work without using "I", since "we" doesn't really make sense in terms of individual accomplishments. Would third-person pronouns be appropriate here?

Joe said...

When the work being described applies to a specific person, third-person description applies. Again, imagine that the document is speaking for you, in this case it is speaking about you.

Natascha said...

will we be able to use Power Point? I know we had some issues with the projector on Thursday. Also, do you have a schedule on when each will have to present?

t. a. s. p. said...

Is it acceptable to list only a few major 'background' items in the background section and include an appendix that is more detailed?

t. a. s. p. said...

Hey Joe, how about posting the formal rubrick for presentation critiques? This way we can plan our presentations with that in mind.....